Add UDP support to Load Balancers
Seems a no-brainer? Less resource intensive than TCP with no state to track. Not all the things are HTTP(S) or TCP!
This discussion has been closed.
Seems a no-brainer? Less resource intensive than TCP with no state to track. Not all the things are HTTP(S) or TCP!
Comments
Hello,
Thank you for the feature suggestion. We don't have any announcements to make today, but we appreciate your input and use that feedback when selecting development priorities. Keep an eye on our news page for future product announcements.
--- David